From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 30 10:04:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA05184 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:04:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA05154 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:04:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA23171; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 09:52:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Alfred Perlstein cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Long IDE probes? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:08:20 CDT." Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 09:52:59 -0700 Message-ID: <23167.907174379@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > re: i think it crashed. > > why does it take a good 30sec at least to probe the IDE hardware? > i have ATAPI in the kernel, except for that, the boot squence would be > blazing fast. That's a different question and I'll thank you not to hijack my thread. Now everyone will respond about the much easier-to-answer IDE delay question and the original one will be conveniently lost. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message