From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 25 20:52:22 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hubs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97655C54
 for <hubs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:52:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (ipv6.irc.int.ru [IPv6:2a02:28:1:2::1b:2])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 073C91803
 for <hubs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:52:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mp2.macomnet.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s1PKqIjq051167;
 Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:52:19 +0400 (MSK)
 (envelope-from maxim.konovalov@gmail.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:52:18 +0400 (MSK)
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim.konovalov@gmail.com>
To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Subject: Re: Future of DNS, DNSSEC, country code delegations, etc.
In-Reply-To: <530C59D7.30204@wemm.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1402260051370.84778@mp2.macomnet.net>
References: <530C59D7.30204@wemm.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: hubs@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" <freebsd-hubs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hubs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hubs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hubs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hubs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:52:22 -0000

On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, 00:52-0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
[...]
> I'm leaning towards a middle ground.  My preferred option at this point is
> to take the zones back so that we have a copy of the data within the core
> infrastructure, and switch to a regional coordinator model.  We kind of
> already have this, except when current regional coordinators move on, we
> tend to lose the data.
>
[...]
> Thoughts?

Go ahead.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov