From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed May  1 20:59: 5 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B2F37B41C
	for <FreeBSD-Stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  1 May 2002 20:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hyperion ([24.156.109.151])
          by fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
          (InterMail vM.5.01.04.13 201-253-122-122-113-20020313) with ESMTP
          id <20020502035900.ZFZF4552.fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@hyperion>;
          Wed, 1 May 2002 23:59:00 -0400
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 23:59:05 -0400
Subject: Re: Why won't bind 8.2.4-REL run properly as user bind  (4.5-REL-p3) not chrooted ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481)
Cc: <FreeBSD-Stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: <chris@aims.com.au>
From: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org>
In-Reply-To: <005901c1f18c$8d891010$020aa8c0@aims.private>
Message-Id: <F231FB2B-5D80-11D6-85A5-00039312C852@automagic.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.156.109.151] using ID <jable3738@rogers.com> at Wed, 1 May 2002 23:59:00 -0400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-stable.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-stable>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-stable>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 11:50 , Chris Knight wrote:

> I think you've completely missed the point of the security branches. 
> They
> are only there for patches related to security, not   wholesale 
> replacement
> of subsystems like you are mentioning. A patch to 8.2.4 would be 
> considered,
> but not a version upgrade.

Ah, my mistake, I didn't notice there was a later bugfix release on the 
8.2 branch; I thought the recommended upgrade path for security patches 
from 8.2.4 was 8.3.1, but I see there's an 8.2.5 release from which the 
ISC are not currently recommending upgrades.

So an upgrade to 8.2.5 sounds more appropriate for RELENG_4_5, in fact.


Joe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message