From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 23:49:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83CF16A40F for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E402243CBA for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:47:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de ([10.1.1.7]) by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBANm0lJ005678; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:48:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [10.1.1.14]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kBANlqCn019072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:47:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kBANlqPM068055; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:47:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id kBANlqQN068054; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:47:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:47:52 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20061210234751.GI54209@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20061208.085456.-1548240230.imp@bsdimp.com> <20061208161425.GU54209@cicely12.cicely.de> <20061210210127.GF54209@cicely12.cicely.de> <20061210.163600.1102529578.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061210.163600.1102529578.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.4-STABLE alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on cicely12.cicely.de Cc: ticso@cicely12.cicely.de, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: bootspi parameters X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:49:59 -0000 On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 04:36:00PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20061210210127.GF54209@cicely12.cicely.de> > Bernd Walter writes: > : On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:14:25PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > : > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:54:56AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : I've found -DUFS1_ONLY in the boot2 Makefile. > : Sounds like I should newfs the media and restart... > > That would help a lot... I did that originally to make things fit, > but now that I've whacked a lot of the extra junk out of there we can > likely remove it... UFS1 vs UFS2 shouldn't make a big difference on SD I assume, so it's more to give newfs the right options. It's booting now - UFS1 was the last point. > Re 5MHz vs 30Mhz. I've had no reliability problems running at 30MHz > on two different boards (two instances of the KB9202, and 4 different > of our boards). Maybe there's a little noise introduced somehow > that's throwing things off... I will measure the signals once I find time. For now VLAN_MTU has higher priority. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de http://www.fizon.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de support@fizon.de