From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 11 17:50:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 684A18A4 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C841484 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:50:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t5BHoWZa043666 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:50:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 200330] panic: pf_addr_cmp: unknown address family 0 when scrub fragment drop-ovl is used Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:50:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kristof@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kristof@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:50:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200330 --- Comment #15 from Kristof Provost --- The problem I have with 'drop-ovl' (and the same applies to 'crop') is that it's a bit misleading. They don't actually reassemble the fragmented packet. That means a far lower system load, but you can't actually filter in-depth. For example, with 'scrub all fragment reassemble' you can do 'pass in inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq keep state', but with 'scrub all fragment drop-ovl' you'll end up just dropping a fragmented ICMP echo request. An unfragmented ICMP echo request will just get through. That goes against what I'd expect. I think you (and really all pf users) want to be using 'scrub in all fragment reassemble'. (That said, if you can break it, please keep using drop-ovl, so I can debug it ;)) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.