Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:17:25 -0800 From: Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org> To: Siddharth Prakash Singh <spsneo@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Google SoC 2009 Idea Message-ID: <49A447C5.2020903@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <e8e9f3930902241107j2e53c9fai9942ab14167831f@mail.gmail.com> References: <e8e9f3930902240943o2e2f4b1bh34916b775692a26f@mail.gmail.com> <1aa142960902241100u671d5f90u769ad98e08fabb43@mail.gmail.com> <e8e9f3930902241107j2e53c9fai9942ab14167831f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Siddharth Prakash Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Ray Mihm <ray.mihm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Title: Multicore Aware Process Scheduler.
>>> I have not gone through the process scheduler code of Free BSD.
>>> Hence, I am not yet aware about the current support for Multicore
>>> Architectures.
>>>
>> Talk to jeff@freebsd.org, the author of ULE.
>>
>
> What are your opinions on this project? What is the scope of this project?
>
>>> Linux Kernel 2.6.* currently supports SMP, SMT, NUMA architectures.
>>>
>
> Does the current scheduler has support for "CPU affinity/binding",
> mechanism for distinguishing varying capability of CPUs.
>
>> These may be there already in ULE, although I'm not sure about NUMA.
>>
>> Ray
>>
>>
>
> Waiting for your response,
>
>
I note you sent this same note to the netbsd mailing lists. You might
want to do some more investigation before you propose a project.
Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49A447C5.2020903>