Date: 03 Jul 1999 20:03:27 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Doug <Doug@gorean.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@yes.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bpfilter -> bpf patches [LONG] Message-ID: <xzp7lohwqz4.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Doug's message of "Sat, 03 Jul 1999 10:06:40 -0700" References: <xzpbtdum593.fsf@des.follo.net> <377E431F.D04C3BE9@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug <Doug@gorean.org> writes: > Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but are there any circumstances > where naming the kernel include file "bpf.h" would conflict with > /usr/include/net/bpf.h? I don't think so. The bpf.h created by config(8) resides in the compile directory and is only used there; the "real" bpf.h is in /sys/net/ (or /usr/include/net) and is only referred to as net/bpf.h. Besides, if there were any confusion, I wouldn't (shouldn't) have been able to build LINT and GENERIC with the patches. That said, thanks for asking - while looking into this matter I found another problem :) new patches will be available soon. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7lohwqz4.fsf>