From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 17 05:40:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB1916A41A for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8667E13C448 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lBH5e3U0055770 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:40:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lBH5e3x7055769; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:40:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:40:03 GMT Message-Id: <200712170540.lBH5e3x7055769@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gnome@FreeBSD.org From: Alexander Nedotsukov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/118481: big5-2003 in converters/libiconv X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexander Nedotsukov List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:40:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/118481; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Nedotsukov To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Wei-Hao Syu Subject: Re: ports/118481: big5-2003 in converters/libiconv Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:37:52 +0900 I understand the difference. My question was more about why you can not use BIG5-2003 when it appropriate? The point is BIG5 in its original form is not a subset of BIG5-2003. There are code points defined differently. So what you asking for is technically illegal. However if this is an *official* way you do it in Taiwan (which will be really weird case) please convince GNU libiconv developers to switchover. Wei-Hao Syu wrote: > because of katakana and hiragana. > > The major difference between big5-2003/big5-1984 is big5-2003 has > katakana and hiragana mapping ( from big5-eten). big5-2003 is part of > official standard in Taiwan and most Taiwanese have the requirement > (katakana, hiragana support) when using ftp/bbs with big5 encoding, > that is why we need this one. > > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:25:35 +0900 , Alexander Nedotsukov > wrote: >> Could you explain why you need this hack and what is more important >> how it will interact with other variants of BIG5 family, please? I >> can see that this silent switchover may lead to incompatibility >> between hacked and clean systems which is not good thing IMHO. In any >> case I strictly recommend you to put pressure on GNU libiconv >> developers to resolve issue at the right place. >> > >