Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 21:03:11 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) Cc: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: top(1) Message-ID: <199505221903.VAA24042@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * > Why is top not in /usr/bin? > > * Because it's in /usr/local/bin? :-) > > And in case you want to ask "why is it in /usr/local/bin?", it's our > policy to install ports stuff in /usr/local/* for non-X stuff and > /usr/X11R6/* for X stuff (by default). I suspect that this person is actually asking "Why is top not part of the standard distribution?". If this is the question, I would answer "systat", although that is not as concise or understandable as top for a newbie. M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199505221903.VAA24042>