From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul  4 20:36:50 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1B2C08;
 Thu,  4 Jul 2013 20:36:50 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net)
Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net
 [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461AD1D9B;
 Thu,  4 Jul 2013 20:36:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from delphij-macbook.local (c-67-188-85-47.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
 [67.188.85.47])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CEBA9897;
 Thu,  4 Jul 2013 13:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=delphij.net; s=anubis;
 t=1372970209; bh=pz1QjjsZvvahfcmdN2qvXIjtvM85bzropJ1k+WNrlgw=;
 h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
 b=iMK6lJYsXSK5BUbcQBRRW3rC/4AkZElroawrlyQR9P+IOxMi5cWvhE7X3Uthz6M1S
 QLf/azlDklAeiwdHq58aHmarhjlJMKnhFUqynbGpEIy+X3bKfNfJw/MtB/8o5aVmai
 LmAuua66cUPpYUw+pu4OlzNDuNEwp3ZZQ8BaEH04=
Message-ID: <51D5DCDF.2030503@delphij.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 13:36:47 -0700
From: Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net>
Organization: The FreeBSD Project
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ZFS default compression algo for contemporary FreeBSD versions
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307041620420.2446@woozle.rinet.ru>
 <51D576E1.6030803@gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1307041950400.2446@woozle.rinet.ru>
 <51D59B6C.5030600@gmail.com> <51D59C88.9060403@FreeBSD.org>
 <51D5DAB9.4070507@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51D5DAB9.4070507@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>,
 Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: d@delphij.net
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 20:36:50 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 7/4/13 1:27 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> 04.07.2013 19:02, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 04/07/2013 18:57 Volodymyr Kostyrko said the following:
>>> Yes. Much better in terms of speed.
>> 
>> And compression too.
> 
> Can't really say.
> 
> When the code first appeared in stable I moved two of my machines 
> (desktops) to LZ4 recreating each dataset. To my surprise gain at 
> transition from lzjb was fairly minimal and sometimes LZ4 even
> loses to lzjb in compression size. However better
> compression/decompression speed and moreover earlier takeoff when
> data is incompressible clearly makes lz4 a winner.

I'm interested in this -- what's the nature of data on that dataset
(e.g. plain text? binaries? images?)

Cheers,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJR1dzfAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuz84AIAMp8BT/a/H4tX1AzytmHxf5o
zVC7yj59BnfmkgdeKbo49fIiEafg2FHRXNsGGQ/3TvMliDqmNPvTmJQwDApH9Efl
oysm/OVcSy7ZtiT/3M2AQqNyzaIB90pidGYwO6oqZ7gwtMi6FJuiwZHsBMiHU92c
F6tieTICIWKj8cF60oWBP+kx8oM4cTfdOt1S2SGfcaBySQdmw3B7Yxg7pLHoUZ1+
6zcaoqFgSEIS8Svnk6pdOCRREUTcAKmE1W7SbEJEgeTbJ7TaCMt64yZoyQqeyayl
KBo9v8/9mYwz89L1ljHoYAXInBMUQxqIiHPvN/H1QFSZomERaLjFSYDYaIbMGeQ=
=6Zmf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----