From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 19 01:29:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE0D16A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:29:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (main.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C132143D2F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:29:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Received: from ppp8-162.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([81.195.8.162] helo=ciam.ru)
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.x)
	id 1B4GJF-000PDk-Pb; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:28:57 +0300
Message-ID: <405ABD5E.5070509@ciam.ru>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:29:02 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Seniura <pdseniura@techie.com>
References: <200403122136.i2CLaCm9096276@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20040318213442.D38635C35@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us>
	<p0602043abc7fca5da6c6@[128.113.24.47]>
	<20040319015159.0B9C011E734@scifi.homeip.net>
	<20040319020843.GA14259@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
	<20040319045833.ED0D811E771@scifi.homeip.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040319045833.ED0D811E771@scifi.homeip.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "proxy.ciam.ru", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  Paul Seniura wrote: > And someone on cvs-src@ actually
	said "icc is free". > See it for yourself here: >
	<http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch˜4937+0+current/cvs-src> >
	Someone should correct that line "icc is free". > Because it isn't.
	[...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.7 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	0.0 SEE_FOR_YOURSELF       BODY: See for yourself
	2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK      RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address
	[81.195.8.162 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
	0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS          RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS
	[81.195.8.162 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: I believe lang/icc* are not open-source nor 'free', right?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:29:13 -0000

Paul Seniura wrote:

> And someone on cvs-src@ actually said "icc is free". 
> See it for yourself here:
> <http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=984937+0+current/cvs-src>
> Someone should correct that line "icc is free".
> Because it isn't.

Alexander said you: "icc is available for free". There is a differece.
You can get it free, but you can't use it free.

-- 
Sem.