Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:22:52 -0500
From:      Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net>
To:        FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: MFC 7840W under CUPS
Message-ID:  <20120217092252.7175084b@scorpio>
In-Reply-To: <20120217141447.b99dda33.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <fc3bb6c7b4bf770606b95d2514e8863a@mail.a4a.de> <20120211231729.d4ad2f8d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120212083327.0a3b5c52@scorpio> <4F37CBC2.7060609@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120212100038.412369e7@scorpio> <20120217141447.b99dda33.freebsd@edvax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:14:47 +0100
Polytropon articulated:

> Think about that:
> 
> 	% netcat 192.168.123.456 < /tmp/printing.pdf

I can do either:

	nc 192.168.1.100 9100 < /tmp/print.pdf

or	nc 192.168.1.100 9100 < /tmp/print.ps

right now without any problems.

If you looked at the
<http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting>;
page, and you apparently did, then you will have noticed the "Making
Printing "Just Work"" concept that I suggested several months ago, only
to be met by the usual naysayers claiming it would never happen or be
feasible. Obviously, these are the same individuals who claimed that
the "bumblebee" could not fly.

If you have not all ready checked out
<http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting/pdf_as_standard_print_job_format>,
you might want to give it a quick once over. It is very informative.

-- 
Jerry ♔

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120217092252.7175084b>