From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 10 22:37:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9C537B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.wuppy.net.ru (ns.WUPPY.NET.RU [212.30.189.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6576843E09 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 22:37:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from romanp@unshadow.net) Received: from room101.wuppy.net.ru (room101.WUPPY.NET.RU [212.30.189.131]) by ns.wuppy.net.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482721DD6; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:37:31 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:37:31 +0400 (MSD) From: "Roman V. Palagin" To: John Polstra Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS errors at high hz values with TCP mounts In-Reply-To: <200207072044.g67KiBn5001861@vashon.polstra.com> Message-ID: <20020711093340.G1703-100000@room101.wuppy.net.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Jul 7, at 1:44pm -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > I see this problem with HZ=1000, overflow doesn't occured in this > > situation... May be problem lies somewhere else? > > Are you sure? I changed the type of sb_timeo to int and the problem > disappeared on my system. You are right - this is just a coincidence: changes to HZ and Solaris NFS server TCP/IP tuning... The problem realy lies in Solaris changes... - Roman --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message