From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 24 23:10:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3113737B71D for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:10:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (216-118-21-147.pdq.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A3C11131A; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 01:10:45 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <01da01c0b4fa$b368fe00$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Benjamin Close" , References: Subject: Re: ICH2-M IDE controller Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 01:10:41 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think there are a few chips like that, that cannot do ATA100, but only vaguely remember hearing about it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benjamin Close" To: Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 6:49 PM Subject: ICH2-M IDE controller > Hi All, > Is anyone looking at supporting the Intel ICH2-M IDE controller? > This controller is basically the same as the ICH2 controller except it has > extra powermanagment features as it's the for portable computers (hence > the M=mobile). I'm currently using the attached patch which runs > flawlessly on my laptop. However, I'm just an amature code hacker and > hence can't guarentee I haven't missed something between the chipsets. > > The other question I have is why in ata-dma.c is there the fall through to > the ICH chipset? It seems to prevent any drive actually using ATA100/UDMA5 > features. > > Cheers, > -- > * Benjamin Close > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message