From nobody Wed Oct 15 16:57:01 2025
X-Original-To: pkgbase@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cmy1C6rJFz6Cg42;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:57:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marquis@roble.com)
Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [209.237.23.5])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cmy1C4p0tz3vL3;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:57:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from marquis@roble.com)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from roble.com (roble.com [209.237.23.50])
	by mx5.roble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C4D424D5;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=roble.com;
	s=rs060402; t=1760547421;
	bh=+BvhR/qQ9mx9IMpZqSXt0yYW5fa0an0cTUjzbnnCzNc=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
	b=BvFT2tqLXbkAja8a5CKUYTgIy1EA18IJPw/K5T+XtwWoMbt9e0IaDMQNTft0jfZPX
	 mL/qaIzHlxyW1t1oc2IPTA5/WRxZnQbLtWnIYA5Bzsyxmudmnvr9dJ9r7HfHWEvW9o
	 7yZ9zOrP0zzy/5WlXhqH7smqb2/h0O4xHz2NPi7M=
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com>
To: Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org>
cc: Matteo Riondato <matteo@freebsd.org>, Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>, 
    current@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf?
In-Reply-To: <aO-6w2DbInwIupkH@amaryllis.le-fay.org>
Message-ID: <q352p06q-s3ro-r489-s82r-o45n5219os65@mx.roble.com>
References: <324231230.147694.1760527890049@localhost> <aO-QglIdge2VetmF@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <43B68BB6-02FA-470E-A8C5-99D15E3707D7@FreeBSD.org> <aO-TUeDnFPOS6Pds@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <89861E7A-64C7-47CB-89F6-A93AB14813FF@FreeBSD.org>
 <aO-ZME6G4MbN-0c6@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <3E63F63B-0C90-43E2-BF55-30310B7599D3@FreeBSD.org> <aO-iGGTAFqRTZ8vv@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <7r257p26-qqs6-r1q3-9456-qn3o02rson6r@mx.roble.com> <aO-6w2DbInwIupkH@amaryllis.le-fay.org>
List-Id: Packaging the FreeBSD base system <freebsd-pkgbase.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkgbase
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pkgbase+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:freebsd-pkgbase+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:freebsd-pkgbase+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spamd-Bar: ----
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:17403, ipnet:209.237.0.0/18, country:US]
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4cmy1C4p0tz3vL3

On Wed, 15 Oct 2025, Lexi Winter wrote:
> Roger Marquis wrote in <7r257p26-qqs6-r1q3-9456-qn3o02rson6r@mx.roble.com>:
>> I think most of us would define a minimal jail
> we will never ship a set for a "minimal jail" because this is entirely
> up to the user requirements.  there is *no* package which is absolutely
> required to install a jail, because it depends on what you will install
> in the jail.  so it doesn't make sense to ship any sort of package set
> like this.

How could it not make sense when 'distroless' Linux container images are
so popular?

Roger