From owner-freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Tue May 26 22:55:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E53A2F6A08 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Wq762PHpz46Qg for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4631346B4; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: powerpc@localmail.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [96.47.72.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D6AE47A6 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49Wq760Ppcz46NK for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094DAAB42 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04QMtTxI057406 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:55:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 04QMtT46057405 for powerpc@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 22:55:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: powerpc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245511] lang/gcc9: build with base GCC on powerpc64 elfv1 Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 22:55:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: buildisok X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: gerald@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gerald@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 22:55:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245511 --- Comment #29 from Gerald Pfeifer --- (In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #22) > I don't want to open a new bug for that or reopen the old one. > > I'd like to get lang/gcc11-devel building because, as I wrote before, > it serves as CI-like port to make sure it builds. I know no port depends > on that, but you still added ARM patch :) Could you then patch PPC as wel= l? The Arm patch is an unfortunate example. It shows a local patch we are stuck with "forever" and anyone building from pristine upstream sources will get something not fully compatible. (And I have not added it, just svn cp-ed it again and again as part of the whole port whenever a new version came up.) GCC HEAD, which feeds lang/gcc11-devel, just made C++ 11 a requirement which means GCC 4.2 is out of the picture for real now. This renders the situati= on quite different, and in any case - yes, let's use this in a CI-like manner - in the sense of testing close to upstream and working to tackle things upstream. To summarize, let's focus on gcc9-devel and the gcc10/gcc10-devel ports with priority to ensure those are fine, since those are what our users will primarily run for the next year. And in parallel work upstream for anything that's needed for gcc11-devel. Thanks to weekly snapshots we'll quickly pick up any changes. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=