From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 7 20:43:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76331065672 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:43:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DA08FC13 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe3 with SMTP id 3so6151533wwe.31 for ; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:43:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Y06ENPZJRAI0OsxbNWxBPI4k37OHYFhnYeqHUSngzT8=; b=pd7Se0aYT3EItqW8eX+qaQ7EFFmzS8WTbNLV9C6HglpKxboBnzuJpYhU8CeFspHESf IDAdfzrx4l/GsHCWCQQ/QopYD6zC+YVlzYVnTCi2snPXcXBosLxKCw4Q0cjRBDEFIt+d EFHTTK++Mkb7dqIo+mycKGW7qAQKlj0ug3OIU= Received: by 10.227.11.145 with SMTP id t17mr3004868wbt.75.1318020215229; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:43:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.208.16 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:43:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20111007141312.GJ26743@acme.spoerlein.net> <4E8F54BB.4000206@cpan.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:43:05 -0400 Message-ID: To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: doceng@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Conversion to SVN X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:43:36 -0000 On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Chris Rees wrote: >> I'm a new kid on the block but I'm curious why git is being overlooked for > the new repository. > This has been discussed *many* times. I'm certain that if you search the archives you could find more information > Basically we like sequential versioning, which git doesn't do too well (at > all) This is only one of the issues. -- Eitan Adler