From owner-cvs-all Thu Sep 27 15:14: 5 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A0237B407; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f8RME1v06093; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:14:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:14:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200109272214.f8RME1v06093@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys proc.h In-Reply-To: <20010927150646.A82311@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200109272039.f8RKdrn08189@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010927150646.A82311@dragon.nuxi.com> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > It doesn't matter *jack* what you think. > style(9) is explicitly clear how this should be formatted in > FreeBSD-land. Get consensus to change style(9) if you don't like it. > But follow it until you do. How could Julian ever gain concensus if people like you start jumping down people's throats any time someone tries to make a change. Ordinarily I would say that one should just make a change and see how well it's received, but I can understand why people would not be interested in putting up with this sort of abuse. I personally don't think that any change is needed, other than recognizing some flexibility in the layout of complex data structures. The world will not come to an end if someone uses two tabs to align fields instead of one. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message