From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 08:50:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F39316A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:50:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2900843D4C; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:50:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2OGodG2005205; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:50:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2OGocvG005204; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:50:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:50:38 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040324165038.GB3323@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200403231608.i2NG8XmM046696@repoman.freebsd.org> <40608C18.60103@dougbarton.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40608C18.60103@dougbarton.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Clement Laforet cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist ports/devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:50:40 -0000 On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:12:24AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Clement Laforet wrote: > > clement 2004/03/23 08:08:33 PST > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > > devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist > > Added files: > > devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh > > Log: > > - kill .la files > > - bump PORTREVISION ... > I object to both of the stated purposes for this commit. First, it's > been discussed to death that 1. .la files sometimes serve a useful > purpose, and 2. deleting them does not serve a useful purpose. Second, > if a user has the port installed already, a bumped PORTREVISION would > suggest to them that there is some benefit in deleting the existing port > and reinstalling. Here that is clearly not the case. Agreed WRT bumping PORTREVISION. Why does it seem almost all ports committers today think PORTREVISION must be bumped with ever single commit?? This does nothing but cause unnecessary great churn when using pkg_version and portupgrade.