From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 15 16:50:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF21D37B401 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 16:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1061743F3F for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 16:50:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from justin@shiningsilence.com) Received: from home.shiningsilence.com (rrcs-nys-24-169-96-227.biz.rr.com [24.169.96.227])h4FNoMGm013750; Thu, 15 May 2003 19:50:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 192.168.0.251 (SquirrelMail authenticated user justin) by home.shiningsilence.com with HTTP; Thu, 15 May 2003 18:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1051.192.168.0.251.1053039362.squirrel@home.shiningsilence.com> In-Reply-To: <20030515213812.GA8905@pit.databus.com> References: <49537.24.93.1.61.1053029897.squirrel@home.shiningsilence.com> <20030515213812.GA8905@pit.databus.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 18:56:02 -0400 (EDT) From: "Justin C. Sherrill" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: Barney Wolff Subject: Re: load balance ordinary traffic X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 23:50:25 -0000 > This is unlikely to work with cable modems. You're already competing > with your immendiate neighbors for a fixed pie of cable bandwidth. It'll work just fine; the shared cable line supplies far more bandwidth than what several modems will eat, and this area is not oversubscribed. Also, I have a mix of modems - some DOCSIS, some older proprietary Motorola, which use different parts of the broadcast spectrum, and so do not affect each other's bandwidth, directly. > However, what you can't do is have > a single TCP connection on a single local host use both external lines. How about multiple TCP connections on a single local host using multiple lines? I know I could stick particular local machines to a particular network gateway, but at that point I could just hook them up directly to individual modems. > That would require at a minimum cooperation from your ISP which they > are most unlikely to provide. I work at my ISP. What's the cooperation bit?