From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 10 14:58:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DA2B304; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:58:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@vega.codepro.be) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.codepro.be", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4AE21C9D; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@vega.codepro.be) Received: from vega.codepro.be (unknown [172.16.1.3]) by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792DC132A5; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:58:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by vega.codepro.be (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 595B8F0A8; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:58:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:58:32 +0200 From: Kristof Provost To: Oliver Pinter Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r284222 - head/sys/netpfil/pf Message-ID: <20150610145832.GA2301@vega.codepro.be> References: <201506101344.t5ADi4fk023661@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Checked-By-NSA: Probably User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:58:37 -0000 On 2015-06-10 16:53:33 (+0200), Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 6/10/15, Kristof Provost wrote: > > Author: kp > > Date: Wed Jun 10 13:44:04 2015 > > New Revision: 284222 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/284222 > > > > Log: > > pf: address family must be set when creating a pf_fragment > > > > This commit required to 10-STABLE too or this bug exists only in > 11-CURRENT? If the former, you have any plan to MFC the patch? > This is current-only. It's a result of the work done to make pf understand v6 fragmentation. That hasn't been merged back to 10-STABLE yet (although I have a vague plan to do this). Until then this isn't required in 10-STABLE. Regards, Kristof