From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 21:36:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3512E106566B for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1947C8FC0A for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:36:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.28]) by QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8MAV1b0140cQ2SLA7McrxR; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:36:51 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by OMTA10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8Mcq1b0021f6R9u8WMcq4N; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:36:50 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:36:48 -0800 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:36:48 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20090126213648.GL66858@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <20090126001822.GA38314@thought.org> <20090126005156.GJ66858@comcast.net> <497D0FF3.6090402@telenix.org> <20090126080618.GA51983@thought.org> <20090126091623.a0b50f64.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090126091623.a0b50f64.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Mailer: Mutt 1.4.x/FreeBSD 7.0 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 Subject: Re: can i split a pdf file? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:36:51 -0000 On Mon 26 Jan 2009 at 00:16:23 PST Polytropon wrote: >On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:06:18 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: >> Thanks, Gents, >> >> But according to one smallish pdf file that I send to a web based >> tool, it was not a real pdf. Or, more accurately, it (the pdf to >> speech program) couldn't decode it. > >This is a typical problem with "poorly engineered" PDFs where the >author puts in the text as images (you'll see this stupidity across >the Web, too). In most cases where I've seen this, it's because they had scanned an actual printed document. Many old, out-of-print books are being made newly available this way, so I'm not inclined to complain. Unfortunately, OCR software still isn't reliable enough (or, if reliable, cheap enough) to convert these scanned images to actual text.