From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 28 06:48:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29EF106566C; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:48:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0288FC17; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:48:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p8S6mahG019284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:48:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p8S6madl019277; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA17944; Tue, 27 Sep 11 23:47:49 PDT Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:47:07 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: lists@eitanadler.com Message-Id: <4e83255b.g7c+BRfF0FDmiYc+%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20110926230335.041fd9aa@lab.lovett.com> <86mxdqfq69.fsf@gmail.com> <4E818941.7060006@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:51:59 +0000 Cc: gakuusta@mail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ade@freebsd.org, ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:48:38 -0000 Eitan Adler wrote: > 2011/9/27 O. Hartmann : > > Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin > > 10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating system ... > > FreeBSD XP anyone? Are you sure there's a sufficient window of opportunity? :)