Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:12:26 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Monolithic vs Modular Kernel? Message-ID: <4B20BB7A.7050502@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200912100939.07116.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> References: <200912100939.07116.naylor.b.david@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the pros and cons of building a stripped down kernel and loading all
> the missing parts via modules (such that you end up with the same
> functionality as generic kernel) vs having a kernel with all the modules built
> in?
Flexibility mainly. The default kernel is pretty highly modularized nowadays,
meaning that it doesn't need to be enormous but can still support most hardware
encountered in the field. Even so, it still contains some wired-in code to
support certain classes of functionality that will not be necessary on all
systems.
In general, there's not a huge benefit compared to the inconvenience to be gained
from aggressively stripping down your kernel nowadays, unless you have a
particular need for a really minimal system.
> Also, is there anyway to detect if there are hardware without drivers (such as
> a sound card without any snd_ loaded) and to detect the type of device (e.g.
> network, usb, sound, graphics)?
Running:
# pciconf -lv
will show up any devices on the PCI busses without any attached drivers.
Similarly usbconfig(8) will tell you all about attached USB busses and devices.
> Lastly, is there any way to determine what 'modules' a kernel is build with?
Examine the kernel configuration file. If you don't have access to this, you
might be able to extract it from the kernel image if it has been built with
options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE
however, AFAIK this isn't the default for GENERIC kernels.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3
7 Priory Courtyard
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW, UK
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAksgu38ACgkQ3jDkPpsZ+VaMuACgkdoEiHCIlgFRRk172olfMJUI
CYIAnAn1rN3d+zxHZSbfLIvQR8A7OSzX
=SGF7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B20BB7A.7050502>