From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 20 16:04:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2E4106570C for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shaun@FreeBSD.org) Received: from dione.picobyte.net (81-86-230-94.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.230.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C47758FC28 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shaun@FreeBSD.org) Received: from charon.picobyte.net (charon.picobyte.net [IPv6:2001:770:15d::fe03]) by dione.picobyte.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB643B815; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:29:51 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:29:51 +0100 From: Shaun Amott To: David Wolfskill Message-ID: <20080720152945.GA1875@charon.picobyte.net> References: <873am4bu7a.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <20080720124951.GJ13924@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <87prp8acyf.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <20080720134627.GK13924@bunrab.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080720134627.GK13924@bunrab.catwhisker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (FreeBSD i386) Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: How to post good follow-ups to bug-followup@ ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:04:54 -0000 On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:46:27AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:13:04PM +0530, Ashish Shukla ???????????? ??????????????? wrote: > > ... > > > So either encoding them so they do get properly decoded, or ensuring > > > that they remain as-is (no MIME encoding or claims of same) should do > > > the trick. I think I'd be more inclined toward the latter approach, if > > > possible. > > > > You mean, no quoted-printable attachments, but using 7bit > > Content-Transfer-Encoding instead, hmm...? > > I suspect that Fabian Keil's suggestion that the Web interface might > have trouble with signed messages may well be on the mark. > Signed messages shouldn't be a problem in principle, but that message looks sufficiently dodgy to confuse the simplistic parser. The quoted printable header also isn't caught, so the attachment doesn't get decoded either. I'll take a look when I get a chance... I've got some other (related) fixes due too. -- Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson