From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 17 03:20:34 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA17731 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 03:20:34 -0700 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id DAA17725 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 03:20:31 -0700 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA29970 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Sat, 17 Jun 1995 05:06:56 -0500 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA02208; 17 Jun 95 05:06:13 CDT (Sat) Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id FAA02205; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 05:06:12 -0500 From: Peter da Silva Message-Id: <199506171006.FAA02205@bonkers.taronga.com> Subject: Re: GPL code in freebsd? To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1995 05:06:11 -0500 (CDT) Cc: iialan@iifeak.swan.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <199506162152.XAA05538@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Jun 16, 95 11:52:06 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 388 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > It wouldn't even a problem if we shipped a binary kernel version with > the isdn driver, since we do also provide the source code. Problems > will only arise for those who intend to distribute modified binaries > without making the modified source available. i.e., that distribution would be under the GPV. I still say, no GPL in the kernel period. Provide GPL code as add-ons only.