From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Feb  2 17:13:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA25907
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 2 Feb 1996 17:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.164])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA25887
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 2 Feb 1996 17:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id RAA03026; Fri, 2 Feb 1996 17:10:53 -0800
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 17:10:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu>
Reply-To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu
To: Joel Zimba <jzimba@Access.Mountain.Net>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: freebsd-2.0
In-Reply-To: <199602020451.XAA02677@Access.Mountain.Net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960202171012.2942A-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 1 Feb 1996, Joel Zimba wrote:

> is 2.0 anywhere to be found?  or am I condemned to using 2.1?

My question would be:

WHY do you want to use 2.0??

1.1.5.1 I can understand, but not 2.0.  

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@gladstone.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major