Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 01:29:21 +0300 (EEST) From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@mail-in.net> To: deischen@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc_r/uthread uthread_kern.c uthread_sig.c Message-ID: <200105042229.f44MTL018949@Mail-In.Net> In-Reply-To: <200105042037.f44Kb8878282@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 May 2001 13:37:08 -0700 (PDT), Daniel Eischen wrote:
> deischen 2001/05/04 13:37:08 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> lib/libc_r/uthread uthread_kern.c uthread_sig.c
> Log:
> Move the check for a pending signals to after the thread has been
> placed in any scheduling queue(s). The process of dispatching
> signals to a thread can change its state which will attempt to add
> or remove the thread from any scheduling queue to which it belongs.
> This can break some assertions if the thread isn't in the queue(s)
> implied by its state.
>
> When adding dispatching a pending signal to a thread, be sure to
> remove the signal from the threads set of pending signals.
>
> PR: 27035
> Tested by: brian
> MFC in: 1 week
^^^^^^ - did you intend this fied for my brand new MFC
notification service? If so, I would like to point out that it currently
recognises only "MFC after: ...", however I could change it to "MFC in"
if you think that it is more appropriate.
-Maxim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105042229.f44MTL018949>