From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 16 14:29:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA22250 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 14:29:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.tar.com (ns.tar.com [204.95.187.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA22245 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 14:29:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@tar.com) Received: from ppro.tar.com (ppro.tar.com [204.95.187.9]) by ns.tar.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA20111; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:29:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from lists@tar.com) Message-Id: <199812162229.QAA20111@ns.tar.com> From: "Richard Seaman, Jr." To: "Julian Elischer" Cc: "Archie Cobbs" , "current@FreeBSD.ORG" Date: Wed, 16 Dec 98 16:29:21 -0600 Reply-To: "Richard Seaman, Jr." X-Mailer: PMMail 1.92 For OS/2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Linux Threads patches available Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 16 Dec 1998 13:07:32 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: >The kernel components of this are very self contained and will not >jeapardise other sytem code.. >I would like to extract them and check them in to assist testing, and >to make such things as star-office 3.0 to run "out of the box" > >Anyone have any objections? Not me. I've been running the patches here for a while with no problems in any non-threaded code (no real problems in threaded code either). Never-the-less, I would feel better if someone looked at the vm stack code carefully before its committed. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message