From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 17 06:04:49 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA11785 for current-outgoing; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 06:04:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ravenock.cybercity.dk (ravenock.cybercity.dk [194.16.57.32]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA11778 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 06:04:44 -0800 (PST) Received: (from sos@localhost) by ravenock.cybercity.dk (8.8.5/8.7.3) id PAA04521; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:06:15 +0100 (MET) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <199703171406.PAA04521@ravenock.cybercity.dk> Subject: Re: Which lists for discussion. In-Reply-To: from Richard Wackerbarth at "Mar 17, 97 06:28:24 am" To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:06:15 +0100 (MET) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Richard Wackerbarth who wrote: > joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) replies: > > >As mika ruohotie wrote: > > > >> while i post, to me it sounds a nice idea to twiddle the naming like it > >> was suggested... > >> > >> 2.1.x stable > >> 2.2.x current > >> 3.0.x future (experimental?) > > > >Well, we've been referring to the experimental stuff as -current for > >all the time. I'm afraid it's simply too late switching paradigms > >now, since it would confuse the hell out of the users. > > I can also argue that all 2.2 discussion has always been on "current" > and never on "stable". Rather than move the 2.2 discussion, we could > equally move the 3.0 discussion. Well, actually it is quite easy: 2.1.X dead 2.2.X stable 3.x.x current Thats it, like it or not :) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team Even more code to hack -- will it ever end ..