Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 09:55:57 -0700 (MST) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> To: syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au (Stephen McKay) Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Administrivia: charter clarification question Message-ID: <199912041655.JAA69209@panzer.kdm.org> In-Reply-To: <199912041637.CAA03403@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au> from Stephen McKay at "Dec 5, 1999 02:37:58 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephen McKay wrote... > In response to my recent thread "Tape driver problems" I was advised twice > by a respectable FreeBSD citizen that my posting was misfiled and should > have gone to -current. Quote: > > "If it's -CURRENT, talk about it on -CURRENT. That overrides anything else." > > It is my belief that scsi stuff should be discussed on -scsi no matter > whether it is -current, -stable, or some older release. Am I wrong? > The charter as it stands is rather thin: > > >>>> info freebsd-scsi > FREEBSD-SCSI SCSI subsystem > This is the mailing list for people working on the scsi subsystem > for FreeBSD. You are correct. Any SCSI problem should be discussed here first, instead of in -current or -stable. I certainly read this list before any other FreeBSD list, and I suspect the same is true for Justin and Matt as well. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912041655.JAA69209>