From owner-cvs-all Fri Sep 25 13:01:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA00489 for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 13:01:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA00463 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 13:01:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA07620; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 13:00:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Message-Id: <199809252000.NAA07620@austin.polstra.com> To: mike@smith.net.au Subject: Re: VM fix for write()/mmap() corruption PR going in later today In-Reply-To: <199809251906.MAA00695@dingo.cdrom.com> References: <199809251906.MAA00695@dingo.cdrom.com> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: dillon@backplane.com, committers@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 13:00:29 -0700 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In article <199809251906.MAA00695@dingo.cdrom.com>, Mike Smith wrote: > > Does anyone have any objections to my commiting the patch into -stable > > as well? > > I would be inclined to hold off for a couple of weeks until the patch > to -current has proven not to have any side-effects. I strongly agree with Mike. I object to the idea of putting it into -stable immediately. That's not what -stable is for, and we've been burned too many times in the past by just this sort of change. -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth