From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 25 15:49:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2203916A468 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 15:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from wmail.teledomenet.gr (wmail.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D095113C458 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 15:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B201C8514; Fri, 25 May 2007 18:15:55 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Stephen.Clark@seclark.us Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 18:12:32 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <4656D0FB.5070200@seclark.us> In-Reply-To: <4656D0FB.5070200@seclark.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705251812.32973.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Subject: Re: network performance 6.1 stable vs 4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:49:20 -0000 On Friday 25 May 2007 15:05, Stephen Clark wrote: > We have a person that is testing the both system inhouse surfing out > over the internet on our T1 link and he complains that he is consistently seeing the 6.1 version being much slower than the > 4.9 version (on the same hardware). FreeBSD cannot handle 1.5Mbps? OK it's actually 3Mbps. Doesn't this sound a bit weird(or funny)? Can you please elaborate? Nikos