From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 3 17:27:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com (cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com [24.2.89.207]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E3B1565F for ; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 17:27:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com) Received: (from cjc@localhost) by cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id UAA28041; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 20:27:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from cjc) From: "Crist J. Clark" Message-Id: <199906040027.UAA28041@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> Subject: Re: 2 ethernet cards In-Reply-To: <00d101beadf1$5fe32d80$16b4010a@msb.int.danadata.dk> from Morten Seeberg at "Jun 3, 99 08:46:21 pm" To: morten@seeberg.dk (Morten Seeberg) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 20:27:24 -0400 (EDT) Cc: zvi@zvi.t-networking.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: cjclark@home.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Morten Seeberg wrote, > I believe FreeBSD follows the IP rule which states, that you cannot use the > first and last subnet, when you subnet. Which means, that you need to subnet > in to 4 nets, and not use the first and last. If so, could this not be the > problem? > > Someone correct if Im wrong? You are wrong (unless your routing daemon is _ancient_). According RFC 1812 subnets of all zeros or all ones are legal and should be supported by all routers. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message