Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:29:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi@kde.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: uthread_init.c again Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10204210028090.27904-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20020420224229.GA13290@ugly.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > hello, > > this is again about the _thread_kern_pipe issue raised a few days ago. > thinking about it again, it's nonsense to create any pid-specific > workarounds by creating fake stdio. the solution is straightforward; > patch attached (completely untested). > note, that the open() wrapper (and other calls that create fds) need to > check, if the newly created fd is a stdio one and adjust > _pthread_stdio_flags - at least this is my understanding of this voodoo. > but then, i don't have the faintest idea of what i'm talking about. :) I like this patch better :-) Thanks, -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10204210028090.27904-100000>