From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 19 13:20:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB7E16A400 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA7113C441 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from [80.171.116.201] (helo=[192.168.178.27]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML21M-1HJ8Ek3epD-0002O5; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:07:27 +0100 Message-ID: <45D9A109.5010505@janh.de> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:07:21 +0100 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070103) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: 20070218174549.GA2489@roadrunner.q.local Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:d7781a442c21a226569d6437949909a2 X-Provags-ID2: V01U2FsdGVkX18FeN/sC6MddPFKHywliR95fTlvjBZ8VhMJIBG7i3+3DlM8dHpwaFU66u0Vbn32CWh74VKu9uN5R7CX3ZXGV3WsighYeBtd2FSPDsXBbI4r3g== Cc: Subject: Re: sysutils/fusefs-ntfs working for anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:20:26 -0000 On 6.2-RELEASE using fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_4, fusefs-libs-2.6.2, and fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1, I can mount my existing (Windows XP) NTFS partition with 'ntfs-3g /dev/ad0s1 /mnt/ad0s1'. The following error messages about missing /proc/filesystems and modprobe can be ignored, since defaults are assumed in case of missing information. (I read about it on a fusefs mailing list concerning Darwin.) Reading from the ntfs slice works ok as I get about 12MB/s copying a 200MB file, but writing to it does not give the results I was expecting from the claims at the ntfs-3g website: only 44KB/s copying a 4MB file. Thus, basically it works thought writing is terribly slow. Jan Henrik