From owner-cvs-all Fri Sep 15 13:39:56 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E56C37B423; Fri, 15 Sep 2000 13:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A80D71C75; Fri, 15 Sep 2000 16:39:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 16:39:52 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Rajesh Vaidheeswarran Cc: Ade Lovett , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/cons-test Makefile ports/devel/cons-test/files md5 ports/devel/cons-test/pkg COMMENT DESCR MESSAGE PLIST Message-ID: <20000915163952.R47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200009152038.QAA17587@mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200009152038.QAA17587@mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com>; from rv@freebsd.org on Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 04:38:16PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 04:38:16PM -0400, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran wrote: > Actually, I don't mind the suggestion that the port be named cons-testbed. > But, given the fact that the name of the original package itself is cons-test, > and that every other OS package (RPM, deb, etc.) we have created for it > took that name, I feel that it might just help confuse users when going > across different platforms. Based on all of the clarifications that this isn't another version of cons, but an actually program called "cons-test", I feel everything should stay as is, and we should trust Rajesh's naming conventions in the future. :-> -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message