From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep  1 23:33:27 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 68CC916A4BF; Mon,  1 Sep 2003 23:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spider.deepcore.dk
	(cpe.atm2-0-56339.0x50c6aa0a.abnxx2.customer.tele.dk [80.198.170.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 84B6A43FF9; Mon,  1 Sep 2003 23:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk)
Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h826XNx6022652;
	Tue, 2 Sep 2003 08:33:23 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h826XNwj022651;
	Tue, 2 Sep 2003 08:33:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Soren Schmidt <sos@spider.deepcore.dk>
Message-Id: <200309020633.h826XNwj022651@spider.deepcore.dk>
In-Reply-To: <3F542BC5.7040708@he.iki.fi>
To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 08:33:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.3
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ATAng raid not being detected
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 06:33:27 -0000

It seems Petri Helenius wrote:
> ATAng does not seem to detect my RAID set, while ATAold boots it
> fine, first boot -v with ATAng kernel and then ATAold.
> 
> Any ideas if raid configs should be compatible between them? Should
> make sense that they are so people upgrading don't get burned...

Do you have device ataraid in your config file ? (se UPDATING)

-Søren