From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 20:38:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DB0106564A for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pbormida@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED158FC1E for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so407215gwb.13 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:38:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zwykWLPNyurasRyyuavZuWtjZYK993JFLmsgC7T9n2A=; b=OSF5HFUDWlH8kO4rMfgY25axTm0JQgq/OwZJxWbNnhkKHk/ifB1Pu3f7fREufT0Kut RNZlP5PcIuylv+uQ4/bwBeRIdzOsASK1Ow1p82CUs0+A91XXtmxaJgaPBV/X0+grilkp Uz3KsLhWmUjbIcsLJK20wamYUtOcxYcvkYnRs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Rl3ZJyaLJZNIIhf6Nl9ObGECb6FHLpno6aUmHdpgSavzDfjwFYkadhudRG6BtJ7zZV tfArQTi5CSHcthC5AXP/pv0T5a9TPDR4Cjtp2iBv+r4aXQLnUbdHpiAbZ3rar4c+im6h GA1bEDfBiqCmkxm+4tdhM+Q1Hvm2h1DTWly6c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.72.3 with SMTP id u3mr1058095aga.171.1285187881925; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:38:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.5.203 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:38:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86vd5x3hed.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86tylij8pu.fsf@gmail.com> <86tylh7uxv.fsf@gmail.com> <86d3s57ult.fsf@gmail.com> <86vd5x3hed.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:38:01 +0200 Message-ID: From: Paolo Bormida To: Anonymous Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: amule-10275 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:38:05 -0000 No, never looked at wxgtk28 port and I understand it would be non trivial to split it. Building it as part of amule would be better. But I am not here to ask you to do that, just suggesting what might be useful to people wishing to use amule on servers. On the other hand it is true that compiling with X11 and not to use it isnt dangerous nor exceedingly troublesome, just boring and a waste of disk space (and might mess packages db a little). Doing this might be a nice feature of the port for future releases. Or maybe making another port, like "amuled" or amule-core" that builds just wxbase and amuled+amulecmd. If I ever can afford the time I might try doing that after reading the porter handbook far more deeply that what I have done up to now... Thanx for your time. Paolo 2010/9/22 Anonymous > Paolo Bormida writes: > > > My goal is not to build the gui version, just amuled and amulecmd, > > and I think this can be done in amule calling configure like > > described in this howto http://wiki.amule.org/index.php/ > > HowTo_Compile_aMuled > > Have you looked at x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 port? You'd need to split it > into more slave ports in order to install wx_base separately. > > Well, one can build wxgtk28 port as part of amule build an then link it > statically but I'd rather not complicate already not very trivial port. > -- ----------------------- Paolo Bormida Giaveno - Torino ----------------------- Italy -----------------------