From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 12 22:00:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFEF106564A for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 22:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B5D8FC0C for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 22:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o4CM0FFP004852 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 22:00:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o4CM0FMD004851; Wed, 12 May 2010 22:00:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:00:15 GMT Message-Id: <201005122200.o4CM0FMD004851@freefall.freebsd.org> To: apache@FreeBSD.org From: Benno Overeinder Cc: Subject: Re: ports/146393: www/apache20: apache-2.0.63_8 can't start X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Benno Overeinder List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:00:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/146393; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Benno Overeinder To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, stb@lassitu.de Cc: Subject: Re: ports/146393: www/apache20: apache-2.0.63_8 can't start Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 23:53:21 +0200 Same problem here. After some searchig after mySrvFromConn, and checking with the original Apache 2.0.63 sources, I figured out it must be in the patches of the port. Indeed, in www/apache20/files/patch-CVE-2009-3555 there is the code injecting the line "s = mySrvFromConn(c);". According to the header, it is: "Modified patch from http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.2.14/CVE-2009-3555-2.2.patch". In the original apache2.0.63 code there is no reference to mySrvFromConn, and in the other port patches I cannot find any line defining mySrvFromConn. Is this a partial backport of CVE-2009-3555? Cheers, -- Benno