From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jun 17 03:20:41 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA17748
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 03:20:41 -0700
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id DAA17739
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 03:20:38 -0700
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA29913
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Sat, 17 Jun 1995 04:52:34 -0500
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA01981; 17 Jun 95 04:51:58 CDT (Sat)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id EAA01978; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 04:51:57 -0500
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199506170951.EAA01978@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: GPL code in freebsd?
To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes)
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1995 04:51:57 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: peter@haywire.DIALix.COM, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199506161823.LAA05336@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 16, 95 11:23:54 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 323       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> > > Since this contradicts other licenses in the BSD code (of which there are
> > > many) the FreeBSD-Current system is not a legally distributable product. It
> > > seems the FSF may need to take action.

And after Craig Burley (a pretty cool guy) assured me that the FSF was just
interested in protecting *themselves*.