From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 21:02:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E811C16A4CF for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:02:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AF3643FD7 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:02:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 34124 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2003 05:02:38 -0000 Received: from niwun.pair.com (HELO localhost) (209.68.2.70) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2003 05:02:38 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 23:02:36 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Branko_F=2E_Grac=28nar=22?= In-Reply-To: <3FA667F4.7060003@noviforum.si> Message-ID: <20031103230152.F99573@odysseus.silby.com> References: <3F9F9884.3020309@noviforum.si> <20031030050540.GA25906@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20031103140413.GG18358@pixies.tirloni.org> <3FA667F4.7060003@noviforum.si> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: "Giovanni P. Tirloni" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1-p10 reproducible crash with Apache2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 05:02:42 -0000 On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, [ISO-8859-1] "Branko F. Grac(nar" wrote: > Machine locked up in about 5 seconds (this is 1u p4 xeon 2.4 GHz, 2GB of > ~ ram). > > This only accours if Apache2 SSLMutex is set to 'sem' and > SSLSessionCache is set to 'shm:/path(size)'. > > So... there are possible problems with shared memory implementation in > 5.1-RELEASE > > > Brane Can you try updating to 5.1-current and see if the situation changes at all? A lot has changed since 5.1-release. If it's still broken in 5.1-current, we can take a look into it. Thanks, Mike "Silby" Silbersack