From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 10 01:34:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id C12C21065673; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:34:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Olli Hauer Message-ID: <20110110013403.GA92966@FreeBSD.org> References: <201101092101.p09L1TEt092060@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201101092101.p09L1TEt092060@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils Makefile ports/sysutils/zfs-periodic Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-message X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:34:03 -0000 On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 09:01:29PM +0000, Olli Hauer wrote: > ohauer 2011-01-09 21:01:29 UTC > > Modified files: > sysutils Makefile > Added files: > sysutils/zfs-periodic Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-message > Log: > Scripts that uses the the periodic system to create and manage zfs > snapshots. Easily configured via /etc/periodic.conf I wonder how is this substantially different from already existing sysutils/zfs-snapshot-mgmt and sysutils/zfsnap. Maybe we should consider putting some ZFS snapshot management scripts in the base to discourage people to come up with their own numerous versions. ./danfe