From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 08:17:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761E616A4CE for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:17:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060D643D31 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:17:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with dspam-scanned (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CJp8H-0009lz-UE for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:14:13 +0200 Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with spamassassin-scanned (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CJp8C-0009lK-Dx for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:14:13 +0200 Received: from eirik.unicore.no ([213.225.74.166]) by anduin.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CJp85-0009kh-Jh; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:14:01 +0200 From: Eirik Oeverby To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" In-Reply-To: <22C2CD15-219C-11D9-AA05-003065A70D30@shire.net> References: <000501c4b547$6a577b00$0300000a@transcon> <5F8020A8-2141-11D9-A8A9-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net> <22C2CD15-219C-11D9-AA05-003065A70D30@shire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:17:29 +0200 Message-Id: <1098173849.38925.20.camel@eirik.unicore.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on anduin.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=7.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.64 cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: Communications Machine cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Upgrade feasibility, to AMD64/5.x.x or to stay i386/4.9 on AMD64 hardware? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:17:18 -0000 On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 00:57 -0600, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > On Oct 18, 2004, at 2:07 PM, Eirik =D8verby wrote: >=20 > >> Adaptec AAC-2410SA 4-Port S-ATA RAID Controller > > > > This one is gonna be tricky on you, I think. >=20 > Should work fine. I was using a 2200S, which uses the same aac driver=20 > under 5-CURRENT on amd64 a while back before I downgraded to i386=20 > version. Sorry, my mistake. That doesn't help my feeling that most Adaptec IDE RAID controllers are, in my experience (YMMV, and please excuse my language), utter crap, though. Highpoint, 3Ware, and even Promise are lightyears ahead when it comes to stability, supportability and performance (mainly due to the Adaptecs having a nasty tendency to spew interrupts like mad, making the system (interrupt) load go berzerk during heavy disk I/O). >=20 > And I have a 2410SA (same aac driver) working on an i386 machine with=20 > 5.2.1 or something like that :-) now. I know that that is not a 64bit=20 > machine but according to Scott Long sometime back, the aac driver is 64=20 > bit clean. >=20 > Maybe the asr driver is not 64bit ok but the aac one seems to be fine The asr is most definitely not ;) >=20 > Chad >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 >=20