From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 13 22:38:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE2916A417; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from mail5out.barnet.com.au (mail5.barnet.com.au [202.83.178.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF0613C459; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail5out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6CE602219D4A; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:22:41 +1000 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <46E9B8310000385BC949AB@BarNet> Received: from mail5auth.barnet.com.au (mail5.barnet.com.au [202.83.178.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail5.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA0321B10A6; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:22:41 +1000 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (k7.mavetju.org [10.251.1.18]) by mail5auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC662219D61; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:22:39 +1000 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3853A54A; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:22:36 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:22:36 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20070913222236.GF17659@k7.mavetju> References: <200709101328.l8ADSDS6020847@repoman.freebsd.org> <46E97E99.5030103@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46E97E99.5030103@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: pauls@utdallas.edu, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/bro Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/security/bro/files patch-Conn.h patch-Makefile.in patch-Obj.cc patch-Serializer.h patch-aux-scripts-Makefile.in patch-libedit::configure patch-patricia.c patch-patricia.h ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:38:18 -0000 On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 08:16:57PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Added IS_INTERACTIVE to the port > Interactive ports are highly discouraged. What is the necessity for it > here? The problem is that the installation script of the port itself (not the ports framework) asks a couple of questions. Normally when this happens you hope you can EOF the input and it takes some defaults, but here it keeps asking over and over and over. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/