Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:07:39 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 198656] new port lang/riak-erlang Message-ID: <bug-198656-13-WpORd4jMlw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-198656-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-198656-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198656 --- Comment #9 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to nbari from comment #8) > Please forgive my ignorance but you are at level that I just can't follow, is > very difficult for me understand all your stuff, while for me this this seems > to be extremely simple. Honestly, it's because you are not listening to what I'm saying. You have your idea, and you keep pushing your idea instead of listening to what is being said. I *know* what you idea is, you don't need to keep repeating it. > I just tried to create/share a FreeBSD port to install riak 2, my goal is to > have a port so that me an others can compile it and benefit from it. And before that can happen, you need to justify having two riak ports in the tree. I hear you *want* two ports, but I haven't heard why the FreeBSD *needs* two port. > I was told on #bsdports to create a riak-erlang now seems that is a bad idea, > anyway I hope later someone with "time" and more "expertise" could explain or > at least help to contribute making the port. It's not a bad idea if it's required. There is already precedent for this with databases/riak. lang/erlang-runtime15 only exists for riak. If riak is deleted, then erlang-runtime15 can be deleted. I have no object to having riak-erlang for riak2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-198656-13-WpORd4jMlw>