From owner-freebsd-chat  Sun Jun 15 19:22:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA10204
          for chat-outgoing; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 19:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from X2296 (ppp6465.on.sympatico.ca [206.172.208.57])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA10192
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 19:21:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by X2296 (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA00289; Sun, 15 Jun 1997 22:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 22:20:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Vanderhoek <tim@X2296>
Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org
To: "Joel N. Weber II" <devnull@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Plugin? (Re: Complaining at Warner Brothers? )
In-Reply-To: <199706160140.VAA15678@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970615221859.175A-100000@X2296>
X-OS: FreeBSD 2.2
X-Mailer: Pine
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 15 Jun 1997, Joel N. Weber II wrote:

> Being able to change the source is the ultimate API.  :-)

Heh.  Kernel compiles may be fun, but are they really so fun that
you would want to recompile your kernel everytime you changed one
of your shell scripts?  :)  Didn't think so.  :)


--
tIM...HOEk
optimization: The theory that making your code incomprehensible by using
              only one-letter variable names will make it run faster.