Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 01:38:36 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates in latest build? Message-ID: <19990907013836.C10117@relay.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <199909061904.MAA03182@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <v04205532b3f9b4bcedb9@[195.238.1.121]> <199909061904.MAA03182@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Given my above statement of _why_ bpf is needed I think it would be > safe to assume that FreeBSD has done do deligence in it's task of > weighting functionality vs security Correct. And that is why I reduced the number of bpf pseudo-devices from 4 to 1 -- the minimum number we can do a DHCP install and post-install configuration with. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990907013836.C10117>