From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 28 9:30:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C29737B401 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:30:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [193.124.215.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE0C43FBD for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:30:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Received: from drweb by mail.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18ooKk-0004zj-00; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:30:06 +0600 Received: from iclub.nsu.ru ([193.124.215.97] ident=root) by mail.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18ooKj-0004z7-00; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:30:05 +0600 Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (fjoe@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1SHTmRV005116; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:29:48 +0600 (NS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Received: (from fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h1SHTlpC005115; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:29:47 +0600 (NS) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:29:47 +0600 From: Max Khon To: Huver Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.8 PreRelease problems Message-ID: <20030228232946.A4987@iclub.nsu.ru> References: <200302281542.JAA02094@amgraf.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200302281542.JAA02094@amgraf.com>; from huver@amgraf.com on Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:42:48AM -0600 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02, TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.43 X-Envelope-To: huver@amgraf.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! > I suppose this list is "the right place"? > > 4.8 pre-release problems: > > A. The new "__stdinp, __stdoutp, __stderrp" in is causing major > problems for 3.x binaries. E.g. such a binary uses compat/libc.so.3, > but also libm.so.2 -- the latter includes but has no compat > version. All /usr/lib/lib*.so that have no compat version, but include > the new , cause this problem. you need to set COMPAT3X= yes in /etc/make.conf /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message