From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 16 6:21:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from heinz.jollem.com (c104187.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.104.187]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1A737B422; Wed, 16 May 2001 06:21:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ernst@heinz.jollem.com) Received: (from ernst@localhost) by heinz.jollem.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4GDJkJ10089; Wed, 16 May 2001 15:19:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ernst) Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:19:46 +0200 From: Ernst de Haan To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Shouldn't editors/jedit depend on java/jfc ? Message-ID: <20010516151946.A9383@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> References: <20010516144617.A9023@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> <3B027A0E.BB3DDBD3@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B027A0E.BB3DDBD3@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, May 16, 2001 at 04:01:02PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Maxim, > > I wonder why the editors/jedit port downloads a separate swingall.jar file. > > Can't we make jedit depend on java/jfc instead ? > The reason here is the size of jfc. Okay, then how about this: * Create a new port `java/jfc-bin' that just installs swingall.jar somewhere under /usr/local/share/java/classes * Make `java/jfc' depend on `java/jfc-bin' and not install a new swingall.jar file * Make `editors/jedit' depend on `java/jfc-bin' Whaddayathink? Ernst -- Ernst de Haan Java Architect Jollem Information Technology "Come to me all who are weary and burdened and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message